honda0105

Champion Author
Tallahassee
Posts:18,609 Points:1,608,545 Joined:Nov 2008
|
Message Posted: May 24, 2012 5:49:17 AM
goldrose: every Megawatt that is produced w/ non-fossil, non-noo-kay-luh fuel sources helps. Storage is still a problem, but in areas that have lots of wind, for example, you can have a lot more reliance on that source all day and all night long.
|
rjhenn

Champion Author
Des Moines
Posts:22,430 Points:2,228,500 Joined:Aug 2005
|
Message Posted: May 23, 2012 9:06:14 PM
goldrose1 - "Not yet time to depend on solar and wind. They are variable. Research is still developing economical ways to store it for postponed use."
Not that difficult. You use any excess to generate hydrogen, and use the hydrogen when there's no wind or sun.
|
goldrose1

Champion Author
Cleveland
Posts:10,931 Points:1,923,530 Joined:Feb 2005
|
Message Posted: May 23, 2012 4:57:54 PM
Not yet time to depend on solar and wind. They are variable. Research is still developing economical ways to store it for postponed use. Right now solar makes some sense. It is hottest during times when sun shines and that is when solar power is produced, so that matches matches needs for cooling. However, 1. In cooler months it doesn't line up. Sunny times is when less heat is needed for homes and businesses. 2. Many energy hog businesses run 24/7 so solar doesn't match many hours that they consume. Some day ...
|
FunMyster

All-Star Author
Indiana
Posts:907 Points:73,215 Joined:Jul 2011
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 10:19:28 PM
ok
|
robaloma

Champion Author
Houston
Posts:2,591 Points:690,425 Joined:Feb 2011
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 8:08:03 PM
maybe?
|
sydb7

Champion Author
Atlanta
Posts:3,552 Points:1,918,780 Joined:Mar 2003
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 1:47:06 PM
one point of view, not necessarily true!
|
sparky808

Champion Author
Honolulu
Posts:2,993 Points:596,760 Joined:Sep 2011
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 1:28:51 PM
Thank you for posting.
|
Blismo

Champion Author
Arizona
Posts:2,134 Points:403,260 Joined:Feb 2012
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 8:05:01 AM
ok
|
nb52

Champion Author
Grand Rapids
Posts:7,775 Points:1,545,875 Joined:Nov 2008
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 6:28:32 AM
Thank you Denmark and Germany!
|
tomok

Champion Author
Portland
Posts:32,975 Points:2,344,535 Joined:Aug 2006
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 3:08:01 AM
Solar and Wind have been producing so much renewable energy, they have been told to cut back with electrical production. Some wind farms have been abandoned because of inadequate income and they are too expensive to maintain. Rusting in Hawaii! For Nuclear power to be safe and reliable, a very careful site selection is required to identify the earthquake and tsunami hazards. How often do you hear of nuclear accidents with aircraft carriers, submarines or other nuclear powered ships. The military can run safe nuclear reactors and so can certain states. Whatever the size or shape of the vehicle, Produce and ‘Drive’ vehicles with high MPG, are very reliable, have a ‘reasonable’ cost and a good ‘value’ for the money. Consider using other forms of less expensive transportation to lower your cost, if possible! The price of fuel at the pump is too high! 12/22/2012!
|
TIGERPAW46

Champion Author
Florida
Posts:7,120 Points:1,353,810 Joined:Mar 2004
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 1:33:19 AM
Europe made the mistake around 2 winters ago & many people died from the cold. They shut down their coal plants for solar & wind Then when a hard cold spell hit they couldn't supply enough heat. It took too long to try & get the coal plants back operational so people died. Nothing wrong with the alternate energy sources but they still need to be supplements otherwise too expensive and too dependent on the wind or clouds & rain etc. Storage of the Energy when the sun shines or the wind blows is too costly & difficult with storage containers. ie Batteries or capacitors or other materials.
|
LostToo

Champion Author
Illinois
Posts:4,392 Points:975,315 Joined:May 2009
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 12:24:59 AM
There you go.... Closing down wind and solar in favor of Coal and Gas. Now they are makeing sense in Europe.
|
rx7racerca

Champion Author
Calgary
Posts:4,192 Points:1,111,895 Joined:Sep 2008
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 12:24:51 AM
It's always been a given solar and wind can be part, but not all of the power grid needs - there has to be some kind of baseline supply from atomic, hydro, and/or fossil fuel.
|
cmsense

Champion Author
Columbus
Posts:1,358 Points:165,345 Joined:Jan 2012
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 12:22:52 AM
No more subsidies for PIG OIL.
|
rahcat

Champion Author
Grand Rapids
Posts:2,463 Points:661,225 Joined:Jan 2010
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 12:22:11 AM
No more subsidies for solar and wind.
|
jkpsr

Champion Author
New Jersey
Posts:4,074 Points:1,100,930 Joined:Jun 2005
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 12:20:50 AM
Nukes can be engineered to be very safe.
|
speedbump1250

Rookie Author
Louisville
Posts:30 Points:6,175 Joined:Jan 2012
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 12:20:15 AM
europe is nuts
|
tedjm1

Champion Author
New York
Posts:5,609 Points:800,300 Joined:Dec 2006
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 12:19:44 AM
Back to nuclear to provide energy (relatively clean).
|
DavoIL

All-Star Author
Chicago
Posts:806 Points:937,505 Joined:May 2009
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 12:18:31 AM
this is a disappointment that gas buddy should even post this story! First there's no author's name attached to it, and it smacks of outright anti-green propaganda with GE's logo & advertising all over it( guess what corporation designs & builds nuclear power plants). The fact is, solar energy has been extremely successful in Germany,which has a cloudy climate for much of the year.And wind powered energy has been very successful in the state of Texas. This has allowed the postponement of the construction of nuclear power plants at both locations because of such successful out comes. Nuclear energy is very risky and costly to the public. Let's not forget about the recent nuclear power plant disaster in Japan. Nuclear energy is so risky that no insurance corporation will insure them in the U.S., the insurance premiums most be financed by the taxpayers.
I really wish that nuclear energy would work as a viable energy option, but it is just to expensive and risky for us to use. Plutonium is the most toxic substance known to man, and take tens of thousands of years to break down to a safe level.
|
miser709

Champion Author
Grand Rapids
Posts:1,268 Points:1,069,050 Joined:Mar 2004
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 12:16:37 AM
Expert...right.
|
regout

Champion Author
Quebec
Posts:2,950 Points:831,730 Joined:May 2010
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 12:13:17 AM
One of these days...
|
chicoCA

Champion Author
California
Posts:1,970 Points:1,772,580 Joined:Nov 2007
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 12:12:12 AM
okay
|
69Bonne

Champion Author
Gary
Posts:1,145 Points:472,175 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 12:11:45 AM
It's part of a strategy and not the all around solution.
|
otherdave

Champion Author
Indiana
Posts:3,388 Points:1,267,435 Joined:Oct 2008
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 12:10:47 AM
But the tree hugging greenies won't stand for atomic!
|
joel27nc

Champion Author
Raleigh
Posts:10,532 Points:1,857,395 Joined:Mar 2008
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 12:09:11 AM
Atomic is always there; no sun or wind, no power.
|
Ray_10589

Champion Author
New York
Posts:4,941 Points:1,182,010 Joined:May 2009
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 12:08:54 AM
not a bad idea ...
|
Colts13

Champion Author
Indiana
Posts:1,571 Points:547,235 Joined:Mar 2011
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 12:08:50 AM
Ok.
|
1fulltank

Champion Author
Buffalo
Posts:7,898 Points:1,543,335 Joined:Nov 2008
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 12:08:35 AM
Solar has a much better chance than wind.
|
kgbellman

Champion Author
Ann Arbor
Posts:2,703 Points:730,640 Joined:Mar 2011
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 12:07:11 AM
Not sure what's wrong with it over atomic considering side affects
|
Bigwaynef

Champion Author
South Carolina
Posts:11,465 Points:2,079,785 Joined:Dec 2006
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 12:05:45 AM
Kind of power I need instead of gas, solar wind, OK how many miles to a gallon of solar win???
|
Bleeder

Champion Author
Virginia
Posts:8,038 Points:1,699,625 Joined:Jan 2008
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 12:05:00 AM
They are all a part of our strategy to reduce our foreign oil dependency.
|
USCCRN

Sophomore Author
Long Island
Posts:145 Points:104,240 Joined:Mar 2012
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 12:03:46 AM
Alternative energy sources help cut down on foreign energy dependence, help the environment and help the economy.
|
jem069

Champion Author
Detroit
Posts:2,533 Points:686,105 Joined:Jan 2011
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 12:02:50 AM
Ok
|
FreeeBee

Veteran Author
Atlanta
Posts:343 Points:223,845 Joined:Jan 2007
|
Message Posted: May 22, 2012 12:01:47 AM
It can not become alternative but it can help
|
oldiesman

Champion Author
New York
Posts:6,422 Points:2,192,985 Joined:May 2006
|
Message Posted: May 21, 2012 11:58:07 PM
Never happen?
|
TIGERPAW46

Champion Author
Florida
Posts:7,120 Points:1,353,810 Joined:Mar 2004
|
Message Posted: May 21, 2012 11:57:02 PM
Nuclear is the most dangerous source we use, worst than fossil fuel if anything goes wrong. In addition we have Nuclear waste stored all over the world. We can 't keep increasing that waste either since it take up to a million years to decay to non significant levels.
"The burnt fuels are thorium with reactor-grade plutonium (RGPu), thorium with weapons-grade plutonium (WGPu) and Mixed Oxide fuel (MOX). For RGPu and WGPu, the initial amount of U-233 and its decay around 1 million years" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioactive_waste#Fuel_composition_and_long_term_radioactivity
|
Holly123

Champion Author
Charlotte
Posts:3,192 Points:789,010 Joined:Dec 2010
|
Message Posted: May 21, 2012 11:56:05 PM
We'll see what happens ....
|
SparkieMi

Champion Author
Kalamazoo
Posts:3,256 Points:586,960 Joined:Sep 2011
|
Message Posted: May 21, 2012 11:54:04 PM
Time will tell....
|
kgbellman

Champion Author
Ann Arbor
Posts:2,703 Points:730,640 Joined:Mar 2011
|
Message Posted: May 21, 2012 11:53:09 PM
Not sure what's wrong with it over atomic considering side affects
|
tarheelcoastie

Champion Author
Greensboro
Posts:5,191 Points:1,110,180 Joined:Jan 2009
|
Message Posted: May 21, 2012 11:52:49 PM
Yep!
|
jrsva

Champion Author
Virginia
Posts:9,847 Points:1,612,025 Joined:Jan 2006
|
Message Posted: May 21, 2012 11:47:42 PM
Wind power is indeed a snare and delusion in most places; however, there is 1000x more energy from the sun striking the earth than is needed to power all of mankind. We must trap and utilize only a tiny fraction of it. Costs are falling. We need solar collectors on every roof.
|
Mermaan

Champion Author
Boston
Posts:1,572 Points:421,235 Joined:Apr 2011
|
Message Posted: May 21, 2012 11:45:24 PM
Love wind and hydro
|
ItsMorph

Champion Author
Grand Rapids
Posts:33,422 Points:3,184,205 Joined:Mar 2004
|
Message Posted: May 21, 2012 11:43:20 PM
Well, I'd keep a few nuclear plants around rather than constant use of coal. Hydro is more preferable, however.
|
pinkelefant

Champion Author
Sacramento
Posts:19,581 Points:2,659,630 Joined:Aug 2003
|
Message Posted: May 21, 2012 11:41:28 PM
I like wind. We have enough here in Sacramento with our Brown governor.
|
gd83goldwinger

Champion Author
South Bend
Posts:1,428 Points:503,480 Joined:May 2011
|
Message Posted: May 21, 2012 11:41:11 PM
Ok.
|
Saturn93

Champion Author
Salt Lake City
Posts:7,292 Points:1,640,885 Joined:Oct 2006
|
Message Posted: May 21, 2012 11:38:58 PM
Global energy needs will only be met through the development of all available technologies (including nuclear), used appropriately for each area.
|
USAv8tor

Veteran Author
Long Island
Posts:348 Points:138,665 Joined:Mar 2012
|
Message Posted: May 21, 2012 11:38:36 PM
If every home owner and commercial business implemented solar power because of incentives and subsidies from the government, we could lower our dependency on foreign energy sources, reduce pollution and help the economy.
|
Taurus1

Champion Author
Ohio
Posts:3,125 Points:1,672,750 Joined:Apr 2006
|
Message Posted: May 21, 2012 11:34:04 PM
ok
|
mfeldstein

Champion Author
Ottawa
Posts:8,161 Points:1,928,430 Joined:Feb 2007
|
Message Posted: May 21, 2012 11:31:45 PM
I agree. Let's get smart and put $100 billion to research to absolutely ensure the safety of nuclear power stations and the security of spent fuel disposal.
|
aquarinut

Champion Author
British Columbia
Posts:1,628 Points:436,105 Joined:Jul 2011
|
Message Posted: May 21, 2012 11:24:29 PM
In the mean time.... obama and his cronies are still throwing billions towards the solar and wind "alternative way to make friends rich" scheme.
November 2012!!!! NOBAMA!!!
|